One of our sales representatives will contact you shortly.
Military events don’t run on “best effort.”
When you’re managing a change of command, a defense summit, a procurement briefing, or a joint-agency ceremony, small mistakes don’t just feel awkward. They can create real risk. The reason is simple: military and defense events are built on protocol, access control, and accountability. Standard event software is built for convenience.
That gap shows up fast.
First, there’s rank-based protocol. Who is invited first, who sits where, who speaks when, who gets access to which rooms, and who is allowed to approve changes. In most organizations, this is handled with a mix of spreadsheets, emails, and last-minute calls. In defense environments, that’s not good enough. Protocol is not “nice to have.” It is the operating system of the event.
Then there are clearance levels. Not everyone can see the same agenda, enter the same sessions, or access the same materials. Many military events include restricted attendance and segmented sessions where different groups need different access. Some content is public. Some is internal. Some is sensitive. A one-size-fits-all registration flow or a generic “guest list” approach creates confusion and increases the chance of exposure.
Military events also require secure communications and tight control over who can send messages, upload content, and view updates. A simple broadcast email or open chat feature can become a liability if it reaches the wrong audience or shares information that was never meant to be distributed widely.
And you’re rarely coordinating just one team. Many defense events involve multi-agency coordination across departments, branches, vendors, and partners. Everyone needs to collaborate, but not everyone should have the same permissions. Some people should only see check-in. Others should only see speaker management. Others should only see reporting. Standard platforms struggle here because they assume “admin access” is enough.
Finally, there’s command-level reporting. Leaders need clear answers: Who attended? Who checked in? Which sessions were accessed? Where were the bottlenecks? What was shared, and by whom? For defense and military protocol events, those answers can’t be based on guesswork. They need to be traceable.
This is why military event protocol software exists. You’re not just planning an event. You’re managing a controlled environment with hierarchy, restricted access, and structured workflows.
Standard event platforms help you run events. Military protocol requires something else:
Protocol must be embedded into the infrastructure, not managed “around” it.
Military event protocol software is a secure event management platform designed to support defense and government events with structured rank-based workflows, clearance-level access control, secure credentialing, hybrid broadcasting, and audit-compliant reporting.
In plain terms: it’s event software built for environments where protocol is mandatory, not optional.
Most event tools are designed for speed and simplicity. They help you create a page, collect RSVPs, send emails, and check people in. That works fine for regular conferences.
Military and defense events have different rules.
With military event protocol software, you can set up the event so the system itself helps enforce what matters most:
Rank-based workflows: Clear roles for who can approve changes, manage speakers, and control sensitive details.
Clearance-level access control: Different groups see different sessions, agendas, and content, based on what they’re allowed to access.
Secure credentialing: Controlled check-in and badge/credential workflows that reduce the risk of unauthorized access.
Hybrid broadcasting: The ability to run public segments and restricted segments side by side, with controlled access.
Audit-compliant reporting: A reliable record of what happened, who accessed what, and how the event performed.
This is the key difference from generic event tools: standard platforms assume everyone is mostly equal in access and visibility. They may offer “admins” and “attendees,” but they don’t handle real protocol logic well.
It’s also different from basic meeting platforms like video meeting apps. Those tools are made for calls. They are not built to manage registration, clearance-based segmentation, onsite credentialing, or post-event reporting at the level defense organizations often require.
If your event includes restricted audiences, multiple agencies, or both public and classified segments, military event protocol software gives you the structure to run it with control, clarity, and less risk.
Military and defense events can look simple on paper: a date, a venue, a guest list, and a run of show. But the real work is in the operational details. These events often involve rank hierarchies, sensitive access rules, and multiple teams working simultaneously. If any part of the system breaks, you get confusion at best, and a security issue at worst.
Here are the most common challenges that make military event management very different from standard event planning.
In military environments, order matters. Protocol is not just etiquette. Its structure.
That structure shows up in:
Seating hierarchy: You need a seating plan that reflects rank, role, and delegation rules. A “first-come, first-served” approach can create problems quickly.
Speaker order: The run of show must follow protocol. Who opens, who introduces, who closes, and where speeches fit in the agenda all have meaning.
VIP placement: VIPs may require specific arrival routes, secure holding rooms, assigned escorts, and specific seating zones.
Invitation logic: Invitations often follow precedence rules. Some guests must be invited before others, and confirmations may trigger a chain of notifications and approvals.
The challenge is that most teams manage this manually. That means relying on spreadsheets, email threads, and “tribal knowledge.” It works until it doesn’t, especially when the list changes at the last minute.
Defense events rarely have one audience. They have many.
You may need:
Segmented attendee groups: Different branches, partner agencies, contractors, media, and internal teams. Each group needs a different experience.
Restricted sessions: Some sessions may be open, others restricted. Some may require extra approval to attend.
Compartmentalized access: People should only see what they are allowed to see. That can include agenda items, speaker names, documents, livestream links, or even the event location details.
A basic event platform usually treats access as all-or-nothing. But military events require controlled visibility, where attendees can be segmented without confusion. The moment you share the wrong link or expose the wrong session in the agenda, you create risk.
On-site operations are where protocol meets reality. A smooth, secure arrival process depends on:
Controlled entry: Not everyone should enter through the same door or at the same time. Some groups need separate entry points, escort workflows, or additional checks.
Badge classification tags: Credentials may need visible indicators (for example, color zones or access labels) so staff can route people correctly without long conversations at the door.
QR validation: You need fast, reliable verification that a person is expected, approved, and cleared for that area.
Access zone control: A person may be approved for the main ceremony but not for a restricted briefing afterward. That means check-in and access must work by zone, not just by “attendee.”
If credentialing isn’t secure and well-structured, lines get long, staff start improvising, and the risk of letting the wrong person into the wrong area goes up.
Many defense events are joint efforts. That’s where coordination becomes difficult.
Common needs include:
Shared dashboards: Multiple teams need a single source of truth for registration, check-in status, agenda updates, and operational notes.
Segmented permissions: Agencies and vendors need access to do their job, but not access to everything. For example, a check-in team should not see sensitive attendee data beyond what they need to verify entry.
Command-level visibility: Leadership needs visibility without being pulled into day-to-day execution. They want a clear view of readiness, attendance, incidents, and outcomes.
The problem is that without strong permission controls, teams either over-share access (risk) or under-share access (bottlenecks). Both slow down execution.
Hybrid is now common, even in government and defense settings. But military events often include a mix of public and restricted content.
That introduces serious streaming requirements:
Encrypted streams: The stream needs to be protected, not just “unlisted.”
Invite-only access: Certain segments should be visible only to approved audiences, often tied to registration and clearance requirements.
Secure replay hosting: Recordings are valuable, but they must be stored and shared safely. Who can access the replay, how long it is available, and where it lives all matter.
Basic meeting platforms and consumer streaming setups are not designed for this level of control. You need a system that supports restricted segments without relying on manual link sharing and hope.
When you add these challenges together, the pattern becomes clear: military events are not just events. They are controlled environments. That’s why the right military event protocol software focuses on structure first: rank logic, access segmentation, secure credentialing, and reporting you can trust.
Most articles that talk about military protocol focus on etiquette and planning steps. They explain what should happen, but they don’t explain how to run it reliably when things change fast, multiple teams are involved, and access must be controlled.
That’s where defense-level event infrastructure comes in.
For military and government events, success is not just “did the program run on time?” Success is also: did the right people get the right access, did we maintain protocol, did we avoid exposure, and can we prove what happened after the fact?
Here are the technology building blocks that make that possible:
In standard platforms, you often get two or three roles: admin, staff, attendee. That’s not enough for defense environments.
Defense-level event systems need role-based access control (RBAC) that maps to real operational structure:
Rank-based roles: Your workflows should reflect how decisions are made. For example: who can approve speaker changes, who can see VIP lists, who can access restricted attendee data, and who can publish updates.
Event-level vs company-level control: In many organizations, some people need broad oversight across all events, while others should only access one specific event or one portion of the program. That separation reduces risk and keeps work clean.
Agency scoping: You often need outside teams involved (partner agencies, production vendors, venue staff). They should be scoped tightly to what they are responsible for, without seeing sensitive data they don’t need.
This is one of the biggest gaps in the current SERP. Most “event management” content assumes everyone can share access freely. Defense environments cannot. The platform must enforce segmentation so the team doesn’t have to rely on manual discipline.
If an event includes sensitive details, the data behind it must be protected by design, not by policy memos.
Key requirements include:
Encryption: Data should be protected in transit and at rest. That means information stays protected when it moves and when it’s stored.
Isolated event environments: You want clean separation so one event’s data doesn’t bleed into another event’s operation. This matters when you run multiple briefings, ceremonies, or summits throughout the year.
Controlled data exports: Exports can be a major weak spot. A secure platform should support structured exporting (who can export, what they can export, and how it is tracked). In defense settings, “any admin can download everything” is a risk.
This is also where many teams struggle with basic meeting platforms. Those tools are designed for calls, not data governance. Defense-level events require event software that treats data like a protected asset.
The arrival experience is where security and protocol become visible. A strong credentialing setup reduces confusion and reduces the need for ad hoc decisions at the door.
A defense-ready credential and badge system should support:
On-demand badge printing: Last-minute changes are normal. Badges need to be generated quickly without reprinting hundreds in advance.
Zone-level color coding: A badge should help staff route people correctly. Zones can represent areas like main hall, restricted briefing room, VIP holding area, staff-only spaces, or press areas.
Security checkpoint integration: Check-in must work with real entry control. Staff need to validate identity quickly (often with QR validation) and confirm access rights for that specific zone.
This isn’t just about speed. It’s about reducing mistakes. When staff can see access rules clearly, you’re less likely to have the wrong person in the wrong space.
Protocol does not live only in a PDF. It lives in how the event is structured: seating, speaking order, entrances, introductions, and transitions.
Defense-level event infrastructure should help you manage:
Dynamic seating charts: Seating plans change. Delegations change. VIP attendance changes. The system should let you update seating without rebuilding everything from scratch.
Precedence automation: Your seating and speaker plans should reflect rank and protocol rules. Even if the system doesn’t “guess” for you, it should support structured inputs and controls that reduce human error.
Order-of-appearance control: Speaker order is part of the protocol. It should be managed as a controlled sequence, with approvals and clear visibility for the right stakeholders.
Most event tools treat seating and speaker order as “notes.” In defense environments, these are operational controls.
After the event, you often need to answer questions quickly and confidently:
Who attended?
Who checked in and when?
Who had access to restricted sessions?
What changes were made, and by whom?
What was streamed, and to which audiences?
What was downloaded or shared?
That requires:
Full activity logs: A record of actions across the platform, not just attendance.
Exportable reports: Structured reporting that can be shared with leadership or compliance teams without manual cleanup.
Command-level dashboards: Senior leaders want a clear, high-level view of readiness and outcomes without digging through operational details.
This is the difference between “we think it went fine” and “we can prove it ran under control.”
When you put these pieces together, you stop relying on spreadsheets, email chains, and last-minute workarounds. You build an environment where protocol and security are baked into the event's execution.
And that’s the real promise of military event protocol software: less improvisation, more control, and fewer risks when it matters most.
Military and defense events are built on control. The plan matters, but so does what happens when the plan changes. A VIP confirms late. A restricted session needs a different guest list. A speaker deck must be swapped. A room hits capacity. A livestream link can’t be shared widely. This is where standard platforms break down, because they’re designed for open access and simple workflows.
InEvent is designed for complex, high-stakes programs where you need structure from start to finish. Here’s what that looks like in practice.
Defense-level events are not just “a meeting.” They are a full lifecycle: before, during, and after. InEvent supports that lifecycle with the controls that military protocol events need.
Website: Build a controlled event site that can be public-facing, invite-only, or segmented by audience type. This is helpful when an event has both public information and restricted details that should not be visible to everyone.
Registration: Capture attendance in a structured way, with rules that match the event’s requirements. This helps reduce uncertainty at the door and prevents “unknown” guests from slipping into the process.
Invitation controls: Manage who gets access and how that access is delivered. Instead of forwarding links and hoping for the best, invitations can follow the right approval flow and audience segmentation.
Agenda structuring: Build a clear agenda that reflects protocol, including speaker order, timing, and session separation.
Session restrictions: Restrict sessions by group so different audiences can have different access without confusion. This matters when there are public sessions alongside restricted briefings.
The point is simple: your event should run like a controlled environment, not a shared calendar invite.
In military environments, “admin access” is not a strategy. It’s a risk.
InEvent supports more structured control through advanced permission profiles, so every person can do their job without seeing data they shouldn’t.
Multi-tier roles: Assign different levels of access across teams. For example, your protocol lead can manage the agenda and speakers, while the on-site staff only handles check-in.
Clearance-based segmentation: Segment what different groups can see and access, including restricted sessions and sensitive information.
IT oversight: Give security or IT teams visibility and control without making them responsible for day-to-day execution. This helps maintain governance while letting event teams move fast.
This is especially important when multiple agencies or external partners are involved. InEvent helps you scope access tightly so collaboration does not become overexposure.
Many defense and government events now include remote audiences. But hybrid does not mean open access. You often need to stream certain segments safely and restrict others.
InEvent supports secure hybrid delivery through:
RTMP integration: Connect professional production workflows, allowing teams to stream from dedicated broadcast setups instead of relying on basic webcam calls. This is common for ceremonies, briefings, and high-visibility events.
Restricted access streams: Control who can access the stream based on registration, permissions, or audience groups. This reduces the risk of links being shared outside the intended audience.
Secure replay portals: Host replays in a controlled environment, so the right audiences can access content after the event without pushing sensitive recordings into uncontrolled channels.
This structure is what allows you to run events with public and restricted segments side by side, without relying on manual link distribution.
Onsite is where protocol becomes real. If entry control is messy, the event feels messy and the risk goes up.
InEvent supports onsite operations designed for speed and control:
QR check-in: Validate entry quickly and reliably. This reduces long lines and reduces the need for staff to improvise under pressure.
Kiosk access: Support controlled check-in points where staff roles can be limited to the onsite tasks they need, without access to broader dashboards or sensitive data.
Badge printing: Print badges on demand to handle last-minute changes, walk-ins (when approved), and delegation updates without breaking the process.
Access zone management: Support different access levels across areas of the event. This is critical when some guests are cleared for the ceremony but not for restricted sessions afterward.
The result is a smoother arrival flow, fewer errors, and clearer enforcement of access rules.
Military events need real-time visibility. Not “we’ll export a report later.” Real visibility while the event is live.
InEvent provides real-time operational insight so teams can act quickly:
Attendance tracking: Know who has arrived, who is late, and which groups are present. This matters for protocol timing, VIP movement, and room readiness.
Session engagement: Understand what sessions are being attended and where participation is happening, especially useful for hybrid events and restricted briefings.
Role-based reporting: Share the right metrics with the right stakeholders. On-site teams see operational status. Leadership sees high-level outcomes. Security teams see what they need for oversight.
This reduces chaos during critical moments because decisions can be made with current information, not assumptions.
Most defense organizations do not run one event per year. They run programs: ceremonies, briefings, training conferences, partner meetings, and leadership summits across the calendar.
InEvent supports multi-event oversight, helping teams manage multiple defense events centrally, with consistent workflows and governance. That means less reinvention, more standardization, and easier reporting across the year.
If you’re planning a defense or government protocol event and need secure, structured control from invitations to check-in to reporting, book a personalized demo of InEvent.
We’ll map your real event structure (rank-based roles, clearance groups, restricted sessions, onsite zones, and reporting needs) and show how to run it with less manual work and more control.
Military and defense events come in many forms, but they tend to share the same requirements: strict protocol, controlled access, and clear reporting. The difference is how those needs show up in each format.
Below are common use cases where military event protocol software makes the work more reliable and reduces risk, especially when multiple teams and audiences are involved.
A change of command is highly structured. The flow, timing, speaker order, and VIP handling are all part of protocol. The event also often includes different audience groups: service members, families, invited guests, and leadership.
Software supports this by helping you manage:
Registration and attendance lists with clear approvals
A structured agenda with controlled speaker order
Onsite check-in that reduces lines and confusion
Badges or credentials that help staff route guests correctly
This is especially useful when attendance changes close to the event date and you need a clean way to update lists without restarting everything.
Defense summits are complex because they combine high-level stakeholders, multiple sessions, and tight security requirements. They often include public-facing segments and restricted sessions that require segmentation.
With the right platform, you can:
Segment audiences by role, delegation, or clearance level
Restrict sessions and content so each group sees only what they should
Support hybrid participation for remote delegations
Track attendance and engagement for leadership reporting
A summit is not just a program. It’s a multi-layer operational environment.
These events introduce more moving parts: partner agencies, delegations, translation needs, different time zones (if hybrid), and strict access rules across groups.
Strong event infrastructure helps you:
Scope access for each delegation without over-sharing
Run different tracks or briefings for different groups
Manage secure communications and updates
Maintain visibility for command staff without exposing sensitive details to every team member
When coordination spans organizations, permission control becomes as important as logistics.
Procurement events and vendor briefings can carry sensitive information, even when they are not classified. The risk is often in access and distribution: who can attend, who can see which materials, and what can be shared after.
Event protocol software can support:
Invite-only registration flows
Session restrictions based on attendee group
Controlled access to documents or session links
Reporting that shows who attended and which sessions were accessed
This helps teams maintain fairness, structure, and traceability in the procurement process.
When an event includes classified or highly sensitive segments, the biggest operational challenge is preventing accidental exposure. That includes visibility of the agenda, access to specific sessions, and how replays or documents are stored.
A defense-ready setup supports:
Clearance-based segmentation (different access for different groups)
Restricted session access controls
Controlled onsite check-in and access zones
Secure handling of recordings and post-event access
Even without discussing sensitive details, the workflow itself must be designed for segmentation.
Public affairs events may be open to media, internal teams, and official stakeholders at the same time. The public segment needs to be smooth and professional, while internal coordination needs to stay controlled.
Event software can help with:
Separate access for media vs internal stakeholders
Structured Q&A moderation (when needed)
Hybrid streaming and controlled replay access
Real-time reporting on attendance and participation
This is where you often need both openness (public) and control (internal) in one event.
Training conferences can look like standard conferences, but they still require strict coordination, role-based access, and clear reporting. You may have multiple tracks, restricted sessions, and a need to measure outcomes.
With the right platform, teams can:
Manage multiple sessions and segmented tracks
Control what different groups can access
Run fast onsite check-in and badge printing
Track attendance, engagement, and completion data for reporting
Across all these use cases, the pattern is consistent: military and defense events require structure that standard event tools don’t provide. Military event protocol software helps you run these programs with clear access controls, smoother operations, and reporting you can trust.
In military and defense environments, security isn’t a “feature.” It’s the foundation. And it can’t depend on people remembering the rules in the middle of a busy event.
That’s why the best approach is simple: Security must be designed, not improvised.
Here are the key areas that matter most when you’re evaluating military event protocol software or building a defense-level event workflow.
Events collect sensitive information, even when the event itself is not classified. Attendee names, roles, agency affiliations, travel details, session access, and internal communications can all become security concerns if handled casually.
Good event infrastructure supports strong data protection, including secure storage and careful handling of what is collected, who can view it, and how it is shared.
The practical goal is to reduce two risks:
collecting more than you need, and
letting too many people access what you collected.
The most common security failures happen through everyday actions:
someone forwards a link,
someone downloads a list,
someone shares a session detail with the wrong group,
someone gets “admin” access just to solve a small problem.
Restricted access workflows prevent those shortcuts from becoming vulnerabilities. That means building the event with clear rules for:
who can register and receive access
who can view the agenda (and which version)
who can access specific sessions
who can message attendees
who can upload and publish content
When workflows are restricted by design, teams don’t have to rely on “please don’t share this.”
Defense and government events often require accountability after the event. You may need to prove:
who attended and when they checked in
who accessed restricted sessions
what changes were made to the agenda or guest list
who approved or published content
who exported data
That’s where audit documentation matters. The platform should support traceable records so reporting is based on evidence, not memory. It also reduces pressure on teams when leadership asks questions later.
Most organizations don’t run events in isolation. They connect to internal systems for identity, communication, reporting, and operations. But integrations can also create risk if they are not controlled.
A secure event platform should support secure integrations that connect systems without creating an open pipe of sensitive data. The key is visibility: who is connecting what, what data is being shared, and whether that data flow is limited to what is necessary.
Defense events often involve vendors and partners: production, staffing, venue operations, security support, or external agencies. They may need access to do their work, but they should not have broad access to attendee data or sensitive event details.
This is where controlled vendor access and agency segmentation become critical. A strong platform supports limited permissions by role and scope, so partners can do their job without becoming a security exposure.When you’re evaluating military event protocol software, you’re not just buying “event tech.” You’re choosing the system that will control access, enforce structure, and reduce risk during high-visibility moments.
This checklist helps you spot gaps early, especially when vendors look similar on the surface.
Ask how the platform handles hierarchy in real workflows. Can you assign roles that match how decisions get made? Can you control who can approve agenda changes, speaker updates, and invitations? If the platform only offers “admin” and “staff,” you’ll end up managing protocol outside the system.
You should be able to create segmented groups and control visibility by group. This includes what people can see on the agenda, what communications they receive, and what sessions they can access. If segmentation is hard to manage, the safest option becomes “share less,” which hurts the attendee experience and creates operational confusion.
A defense event often has mixed content: public segments and restricted briefings. The platform should support session-level restrictions so an attendee can be approved for one part of the program without automatically gaining access to everything.
Hybrid should not mean “send a link and hope.” Ask how streaming access is controlled. Can you restrict the stream to approved attendees? Can you separate public and restricted streams? Can you host replays securely without pushing content into uncontrolled channels?
You need traceability. Ask whether the platform provides activity logs that show key actions: changes to the event, data exports, content publishing, and access activity. If the answer is vague, assume you’ll be stuck with manual documentation later.
Multi-agency work is common, but broad access is risky. Ask if you can scope partners to specific areas (check-in, production, reporting) without granting full visibility into attendee data or restricted program details.
Badge workflows should support last-minute changes and access zones. Ask if badges can be printed on demand and if they can include access indicators (like zones or categories) so onsite teams can route people correctly.
IT and security teams should be able to oversee governance without running the event day-to-day. Ask how permissions, integrations, and data exports are controlled and monitored.
Finally, ask how reporting works. Can you export attendance, session access, and engagement data cleanly for leadership review? Can reporting be filtered by group, session, or access level?
If a platform can’t answer these clearly, it’s usually not designed for defense-level protocol events.
Military and defense events don’t fail because teams don’t care. They fail because the system isn’t built to carry the weight of protocol.
When you rely on spreadsheets, forwarded links, and last-minute permissions, you create predictable risks:
Security risk: Sensitive details spread too easily when access isn’t controlled by design.
Manual protocol errors: Seating plans, speaker order, and VIP handling break down when changes happen fast and the “source of truth” lives in email threads.
Multi-agency confusion: Too many teams working from different documents leads to missed updates, duplicated work, and unclear ownership.
Clearance breaches: The biggest mistakes are often accidental. A shared link, the wrong session visible in an agenda, or a staff member given too much access “just to help.”
Lack of reporting visibility: After the event, leadership needs answers. Without structured logs and reporting, teams are left rebuilding the story from memory.
This is why protocol needs more than good intentions. It needs infrastructure.
InEvent helps military and defense teams run protocol-driven events with structured control across the full lifecycle: secure registration and invitations, session restrictions, advanced permission profiles, controlled onsite operations, secure hybrid broadcasting, and reporting that gives command-level visibility.
If you’re planning a defense protocol event and want fewer manual workarounds and more control, book a demo of InEvent and we’ll walk through how to map your real structure into a secure, repeatable event system.Military event protocol software is a secure event management platform built for defense and government events. It helps teams run events with rank-based workflows, clearance-level access control, secure credentialing, hybrid broadcasting, and audit-ready reporting. Unlike generic event tools, it is designed to support hierarchy, restricted attendance, and accountable execution.
You manage clearance-based access by segmenting attendees into approved groups and controlling what each group can see and enter. That includes restricting sessions, limiting visibility of sensitive agenda items, and controlling who receives links, updates, and materials. The safest approach is to design these rules into the event setup so access is enforced automatically, not handled through manual link sharing.
Yes. Many military and defense events can be hosted as hybrid events, with both onsite and remote audiences. The key is controlling access. Public segments may be streamed more openly, while restricted segments should be limited to approved audiences through invite-only access and secure replay handling.
Some platforms are, but many are not designed for defense-level workflows. Security depends on permission control, secure data handling, restricted access workflows, audit logs, and controlled integrations. If a platform only offers basic admin roles and open sharing, it likely isn’t built for defense environments.
You manage rank-based seating by using structured seating plans that reflect precedence rules and can be updated as attendance changes. A strong system supports dynamic updates, clear visibility for protocol leads, and controlled sharing so the right teams see the right seating information without broadcasting VIP details broadly.
Look for role-based access control with segmentation, restricted sessions, secure credentialing and check-in, hybrid streaming controls, audit trails, and exportable reporting. It should also support multi-agency collaboration without giving every team full access to sensitive data.
